Ferrite toroid at radio frequencies
At radio frequencies the permeability of ferrite becomes complex, and the self-capacitance of the winding stops being a detail. So what is worked out here is not an «inductance» but the full impedance of the equivalent circuit.
| Number of turns N | |
| Operating frequency f (MHz) | |
| Ferrite material (Fair-Rite) | |
| Toroid size | |
| Toroid chamfer C (mm) | |
| Wire diameter dw (mm) | |
| Use the thickest wire that fits in one layer | |
| Result | |
| Equivalent inductance Ls | |
| Loss resistance ESR | |
| Structural Q | |
| Impedance magnitude |Z| | |
| Self-capacitance of the winding Cs | |
| AL at this frequency | |
| Wire length | |
| Winding layers | |
| Recommended wire for a single layer | |
| Ferrite at the operating frequency | |
| Real part of the permeability μ′ | |
| Imaginary part of the permeability μ″ (loss) | |
| Initial permeability μi (datasheet) | |
📐 Formulas
1. Permeability at the working frequency. The μ′(f) and μ″(f) tables for 19 Fair-Rite materials are interpolated with monotone cubic interpolation against the logarithm of frequency. Monotone rather than a «natural» spline: an ordinary spline on a grid like this overshoots unphysically — negative losses and jumps of an order of magnitude.
2. Inductance:
C1 = 2π / (he·ln(OD/ID))
AL [nH/N²] = μ₀·μ′·10⁶ / C1
L [µH] = AL·N²·10⁻³
3. Self-capacitance of the winding (the G3YNH model): the «turn-to-turn» part does not depend on N, while the «end-to-end» part falls as 1/N²:
lp = OD − ID + 2h
le = 2π·ln(OD/ID) / (2/ID − 2/OD)
Cs [pF] = 1.13·10⁻³·C1·lp²/(0.4π) + 1.13·10⁻¹·C1·(0.9·le)²/(0.4π) / N²
4. Impedance:
X_L = 2π·f·L
Z_coil = X_L·(μ″/μ′) + j·X_L the ferrite losses → the real part
Z = 1 / ( 1/Z_coil + j·2π·f·Cs )
Ls = Im(Z) / (2πf)
ESR = Re(Z) + R_DC
Q = Im(Z) / ESR
Notation:
N— number of turnsf— working frequency [MHz]μ′— real part of the permeability (the magnetic behaviour)μ″— imaginary part (the losses in the ferrite)Ls— equivalent inductance [µH]ESR— loss resistance [Ω]Cs— self-capacitance of the winding [pF]
- Wire losses are counted at DC only: skin and proximity effects are not modelled, so the real ESR will be higher and the Q lower
- Each table has its own frequency range; outside it the calculator refuses to extrapolate
- The self-capacitance model is empirical: the real value depends on how the turns are laid and how far apart the ends of the winding are
- If the reactive part comes out negative, the coil is working above its self-resonance and an inductance figure means nothing there
🎯 Where it is used
- Interference-suppression chokes: a high Re(Z) is not a defect, it is the working mechanism.
- Tuned-circuit coils on toroids, where the Q is still acceptable.
- Checking that the coil is not working above its self-resonance — the commonest hidden mistake.
- Note how far AL at the working frequency departs from the datasheet value: the datasheet figure is given for low frequencies. That is the whole reason this calculator exists.
- A low Q together with a high impedance magnitude is normal for suppression materials (31, 43, 73, 75). In a tuned circuit such a coil is useless; as a choke it is excellent.
- The calculator immediately suggests the thickest wire that still fits in a single layer: a single-layer winding has the lowest self-capacitance.
© 2026 UR3PKI · CyberDev.Space · Content licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
How to cite this calculator
UR3PKI. «Ferrite toroid at radio frequencies». CyberDev.Space. https://cyberdev.space/en/radio/calculators/coils/rf_ferrite_toroid (licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).The licence lets you use this material freely, including in teaching materials, but only with attribution to the author and a link to the source.